Showing posts with label M. Jill Dykes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M. Jill Dykes. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Rene M. Netherton- Court Appointed Child Abuser and Child Trafficker

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500918795

Now this is original--- of course a ‘skank’ bottom dweller Topeka Kansas Attorney would define themselves on facebook—pretty much as she is—only this ‘bitch’ (the doggie pic) has more grit than the other ‘bitch’ Rene Netherton.

The only person she scares is her dead mother Marge., perhaps her dead daddy too.

She literally sold out her own family to be a “nobody”. How honorable.

http://www.webpagescreenshot.info/img/48069-622201151037PM

Screenshot Details:Url: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500918795

Created: 6/22/2011 5:10:37 PM

Friday, February 4, 2011

Topeka Kansas Courts Have Continued Abuse Of Claudine Dombrowski and her Daughter Rikki Dombrowski

This is an truly incredible story that should never have happened in America.

Parts of the Kansas Judicial system should be disciplined for how it has victimized Ms. Dombrowski, who was an abused mom.

======

Testimony by Claudine Dombrowski at the hearing of the Kansas Joint Committee on Children's Issues on Nov 30, 2009 in Topeka

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Rest of article from the Kansas Watch Dog here:
http://kansas.watchdog.org/2010/compelling-stories-about-problems-with-placement-and-removal-of-children/

=====

Dombrowski v. United States, #66407 – Petitioner

INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Entire Petition here: http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org/pages/308

=====

Shawnee County Case Docket.

http://www.shawneecourt.org/doe/search.jsp?caseNumber=96d217&first=&middle=&last=&mob=&yob=&location=internet

=======

10th Federal Court District

(This will be re filed and updated to 2011)

Dombrowski v. Richardson et al

Filed: May 11, 2009 as 2:2009cv02250

Plaintiff: Claudine Dombrowski

Defendants: Hal Richardson and Shawnee County District Court

Presiding Judge: District Judge John W. Lungstrum

Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse

Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury

Court: Tenth Circuit > Kansas > District Court

Type: Civil Rights > Plaintiff

Plaintiff:

Claudine Dombrowski

Defendants:

Hal Richardson and Shawnee County District Court

Case Number:

2:2009cv02250

Filed:

May 11, 2009

Court:

Kansas District Court

Office:

Kansas City Office

County:

Shawnee

Presiding Judge:

District Judge John W. Lungstrum

Referring Judge:

Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights

Cause:

28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Jurisdiction:

Diversity

Jury Demanded By:

Plaintiff

=======

Claudine Dombrowski: An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts

Posted in Children, Kansas Government by kansaswatchdog on December 4th, 2009

Claudine Dombrowski:  An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts

Claudine Dombrowski: An abused mom victimized again by the Kansas Courts

This is an truly incredible story that should never have happened in America.

Parts of the Kansas Judicial system should be disciplined for how it has victimized Ms. Dombrowski, who was an abused mom.

Instead of quotes from the audio, please consult these pages that document Dombrowski’s long and difficult battle to protect her daughter:

      As you view these photos keep in mind that the court awarded FULL CUSTODY of their daughter to the “man” who did this to Claudine.

        State Rep Bill Otto: “No crime? You haven’t been guilty of anything? This is a court order that says you can’t go to any school functions?”

        “I was under court order till 2004 to not even call the police after I was being beaten because … I was not ‘co-parenting’”


        Dombrowski: “These friends of the court make recommendations to the judge. The parents … don’t have a right to see these documents. They do this behind closed doors.”


        Otto: (To Secretary Jordan): “You have no rights as a parent …?”


        Secretary Don Jordan: “This would be something extreme … I’m not familiar with the situation.”


        Otto: “Can a judge do that? … Is that legal… ?”


        Jordan: “Under the right circumstances … I hesitate to speculate.”


        Sen. Roger Reitz: “This is something that only … the judicial system can really answer … It would be helpful … to have someone … representing the judicial system … to give us some ideas how this could happen.”


        Dombrowski: “When you are a victim of domestic violence, and suddenly there’s a child involved, the typical …. power of control is that ‘I’ll take your children from you’. They will and they can the way the laws are setup.” …


        “I was told that I’m not to talk to my daughter about the violence. That’s why I don’t see her. That’s why I see her supervised. He was criminally convicted. “


        “When women try to get away from people who hurt them … I heard somebody say it’s really hard to believe you won’t call the police … I tell people not to contact the police, because as soon as you walk into court with a DV (domestic violence) and children, you’re already cutting your throat. You will lose your children. That’s the way it is right now.”


        “… on the 16th of this month I’ll probably go to jail for breaking the gag order and talking about [being the victim of] violence as it relates to my case.”


        Reitz: “… someone ought to be able to deal with this in a way that would address her problem. It doesn’t seem like we’ve done the right thing with regards to this little niche of the law.”


        Dombrowski: “The criminal convictions are completely tossed aside and they don’t have any bearing on the family court … The eight criminal convictions that my ex had before getting custody of my daughter were completely dropped [in family court]“


        Chair Kiegerl: “I cannot believe that abuse is totally ignored. I cannot believe you can prohibit a person from speaking about their own case.”


        “The one thing [where] … I disagree with you is abuse should always be reported.”


        State Rep Peggy Mast (R-Emporia): “Domestic violence is a control issue. Sexual abuse is a control issue. Is there any correlation between domestic violence and sexual abuse? Why is that not something that is considered when we take someone to [family] court that has a history of domestic violence?”


        Dombrowski: “Yes. That is something I’ve asked myself for 16 years. … It comes back to the family court that has a veil of immunity. … They don’t fully understand the impact of the violence. What battered women have … if they report the abuse, then they’re failing to protect their child … if they don’t report the abuse, they’re still failing to protect their child. So, both ways, they’re going to lose their children …”


        For anybody who abuses their wife … [from] a 1996 presidential task force … there is a 70% increase that those children will be abused and/or sexually abused after there’s been battery with the mother.


        Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudea: “In 2004 …. I talked with the homicide department in Sedgwick County…. During that time there had been 21 homicides in Sedgwick County and 18 were due to domestic violence …”


        “A lot of women do make those phone calls and unfortunately, sometimes it ends in their death.” …


        “I want to apologize to you for being treated like a pedophile … not being able to go to a music concert.”


        “I commend you for what you’re doing.”


        Dombrowski:I have not talked to my daughter in 10 years [except] for the confines of supervised visits. I’m not allowed to talk to her about anything. All she knows is what her dad has told her.



        COURTS CONTINUE ABUSE OF BATTERED MOTHER

        http://www.kansas.net/~freepress/7-12-01-8.html

        By Jon A. Brake

        Manhattan Free Press

        MANHATTAN, KS - To some this could be considered beautiful. Solid mahogany is beautiful when given a high finish and it does have a high finish. It is about four to four and a half feet long, a foot and a half high; with shinny brass handles at the foot and head. A child's coffin, in this home has been turned into a coffee table.

        To Claudine Dombrowski it is not beautiful, that is her daughter, six-year-old Rikki on the couch behind the threatening coffee table. If a coffin coffee table is not enough, a hunting rifle hangs on the wall above the couch.

        Claudine, a Manhattan resident, was divorced from Hal Richardson in Shawnee County District Count in 1997. She had been a repeat victim of Domestic Violence and a repeat victim of the State Court System.

        What does the Court System think of the coffin coffee table? In a letter to Shawnee County District Court Division Two Judge Richard D. Anderson, Harry Moore, with the Court Services stated: "When I was at the house, I did not recognize anything which in my experience resembled a child's coffin. After looking at the picture and speaking with Mr. Richardson, I have come to find out that it is indeed a coffin and that it was an antique which he purchased in Mexico several years ago and uses as a coffee or end table of sorts."

        What about the rifle? Mr. Moore said, "There is also a secured hunting weapon hanging on Mr. Richardson's wall. The thing which is striking about this specific issue is that it contains a remarkable leap of logic. For instance, I am the owner of a 7.9 mm Mauser rifle which was the standard issue firearm for the German soldier in World War II. This weapon was procured by my father who served in Europe during the war. This weapon also hangs on the wall in my rec room. Does my ownership and display of this firearm lead one to the conclusion that I am a Nazi?"

        The question Mr. Moore failed to answer is: "Is it a leap of logic for an abused woman to see the child's coffin and the rifle as more than furniture? Is there a message to the mother? The Shawnee District Court has missed many messages when it comes to the violence in this case.

        When reading Court documents it is clear that attorneys have intentionally muddied the waters. It was a nasty divorce, those things happen. Eight or more attorneys, three different Judges and several Court Service workers have filed motion after motion. In the end a Judge wants to compel a dysfunctional family to be normal. It can't be done.

        Halleck (Hal) Richardson and Claudine Dombrowski lived together for several months before they were married on November 22, 1995. Divorce papers were filed four month later. By this time records show Hal Richardson had abused Claudine and he had Domestic Battery and Criminal Damage to property convictions.

        Hal had seven other convictions before 1995. The convictions were for Battery, Attempted Battery, Battery of a Law Enforcement Officer, Obstruction of Legal Process, Possession of Marijuana and an Open Container conviction.

        Most of the Probation Conditions were never followed up on by court officials. After the Domestic Battery conviction, Hal was ordered to attend an "Alternatives to Battering Program" put on by the Battered Women Task Force in Topeka. A few of the comments made on Hal's report were: "Client rude and disrespectful to female co-facilitator as evidenced by his combative stance, his repeated interruptions, his sexist language and his refusal to accept any responsibility."

        Another report stated: "Client very disruptive during group, this was evidenced by the fact that he interrupted the facilitator repeatedly by making rude comments, laughing and telling inappropriate sexist jokes."

        And finally: "Called PO (probation officer) and client to tell them that he had graduated as far as I was concerned. He only has 17 sessions, but is causing too much trouble with his mouth. Terminated, with cause. Will not be accepted back."

        The divorce proceedings were extended for eighteen months. Throughout the proceedings Claudine's attorneys filed numerous reports claiming violations of the restraining order and requesting an order to sever contact between Hal, Claudine and daughter Rikki.

        The first involved an incident that both parties agreed in court happened, they just could not agree what happened. Claudine said she was hit in the head with a crow bar and Hal said it was a piece of wood. What ever he hit her with it took 24 stitches to close the head wounds.

        At a hearing on June 17, 1996 Shawnee County District Court Judge Jan W. Leuenberger signed order giving custody of Rikki to Claudine and authorizing her to move to the Great Bend area so that "Ms. Dombrowski could avoid the history of physical and verbal abuse she had suffered from Mr. Richardson."

        Hal was given supervised visitation.

        As in many divorce cases the Judge on November 5, 1996 appointed Mr. Scott McKenzie, Attorney at Law, to serve as Guardian ad Litem to appear on behalf of Rikki. Mr. McKenzie was very experienced in juvenile court proceedings with more than 1,000 cases but this was only his sixth Guardian ad Litem. Under Mr. McKenzie direction visitation terms were worked out to where Claudine would keep Rikki for three weeks and then Hal would have her for a week.

        Before the Divorce Trial started a new Judge took over. Judge James P. Buchele replaced Judge Leuenberger.

        It is about this time the Court and Court appointed case workers attitude changed. Judge Buchele saw that fifty people were being called as witnesses for the trial. He placed a limit of five for each side. This can be done but it can cause problems. Court documents state: "These limits made it difficult or impossible for Ms. Dombrowski to bring in all of the witnesses to corroborate here clams." During the trial the Judge would not allow hearsay evidence but the proper witness was not there to testify.

        At trial Mr. McKenzie indicated, "after reading the police reports of the violence, and the doctor's reports, he was not able to validate any of the truth of any of the accusations of violence made by Ms. Dombrowski."

        When asked about Mr. Richardson's criminal history Mr. McKenzie recalled only a single offense for driving under the influence of alcohol, and was unaware of the misdemeanor convictions including the domestic violence battery against Claudine. He was unaware of a misdemeanor battery for a bar fight and the battery of a law enforcement officer.

        Records of the Battered Women's Task Force had never been reviewed by Mr. McKenzie. Even thou Claudine had received support from the facility. In a report to the court Mr. McKenzie had recommended anger management therapy for Claudine but not for Hal.

        In Judge Buchele's Orders after the trial he made it clear that he wanted more from this couple than what was possible. Here is what he wrote: "Mutual parental involvement with this child has been made worse by Ms. Dombrowski's unilateral decision to move to Larned, Kansas in May of 1996. The distance between Topeka and Larned makes it virtually impossible for an individual treater to work with the family; for Mr. Richardson to have regular and frequent contact with this child; to establish any reasonable dialogue between the parents toward resolving their conflicts. The move from Topeka to Larned, due to the proximity of the parties, has lessened the physical violence. It has, however, done violence to the relationship of Rikki and her father. If long distance visitation is continued, in the Court's view, will take its toll not only on Rikki but each of the parties. The Court specifically finds that separation of the child from either parent for long periods of time is harmful for a child of about three years of age."

        He then went on to require Claudine to move back to the Topeka area.

        And then Judge Buchele made a judgment that some Manhattan attorneys say is not legal. Judge Buchele ordered: "Further, respondent (Claudine) is directed to not call law enforcement authorities to investigate the petitioner (Hal) without first consulting with the case manager."

        On December 14, 2000 after returning her daughter to her fathers home Claudine alleges that she was battered and raped by Hal. Under order not to call law enforcement authorities and with bleeding that would not stop, she drove to St. Marys, Kansas to get treatment. Claudine knew that if she had gone to a Topeka Hospital they would have called the police.

        In St. Marys hospital officials did contact the Pottawatomie Sheriff and a report was made. She was advised that because the alleged event occurred in Shawnee County she would have to file there. Claudine said that because of the battery and rape she picked up Rikki the next day and did not return her. The Shawnee County Sheriff's Department was called and took Rikki back to Topeka. The court gave Hal custody and orders for her to attend Topeka schools.

        As it stands now, Rikki is with her father in Topeka. Claudine gets two one-hour visits per week. The child will go to school in Topeka unless a new motion, which will be filed this week, is granted. The motion will request that Claudine be given custody and Rikki be allowed to attend school in Manhattan.

        This case has received national attention by the National Organization for Women; the Judicial Initiative Commission Hearing by the Citizens for Good Judges and it was told to the Kansas Justice Commission in 1997.

        A new Judge will be hearing the motion. Judge Richard D. Anderson took over the case on the retirement of Judge Buchele. But, unless Claudine receiveds help from Kansas citizens, the abuse will continue. In July of 2000 Judge Anderson reaffirmed all of Judge Buchele's previous orders. Evan the order to not call law enforcement authorities

        Webmaster Note: You can contact Judge Richard D. Anderson at (785) 233-8200 ext. 4350

        =====

        Americans For Prosperity and Kansas Judges

        http://www.patrioticthunder.com/localissues.html


        The lady (Claudine Dombrowski)

        in this picture was violently beaten by

        Hal Richardson, the father of her baby and ex-husband. Now Hal Richardson isn't exactly going to win any father awards this year for this, and his criminal record keeps growing (Battery, Attempted Battery, Battery of a Law Enforcement Officer, Obstruction of Legal Process, Possession of Marijuana and violation of Open Container law.)

        Shawnee County Judge James P. Buchele refused to permit testimony in this case because his docket was full. If that wasn't bad enough, Claudine was ordered by this Judge to move back to Shawnee County so Hal Richardson could be closer to her daughter and ordered her not to call the police when dealing with her husband, all calls had to go through her case manager first. Allegations of death threats, rape and the killing of her daughter were what the Judge was not letting get into testimony. Outrage, to say the least, read the harrowing account of a lawyers outrage in this matter here.

        Okay, enough already, that last story is just wretched.

        First off, ask yourself this question, do judges make bad decisions? Of course they do, just like anyone who makes a choice does. To be fair, judges make all kinds of decisions everyday that can effect you and I detrimentally as the reason your seeing the Judge. The problem isn't the Judges, it really lies with the criminal justice system in itself. Is it a perfect system, of course not, not everyone is going to agree on the outcome. However, the Judges need to police each other. Now we know, there is a state agency for that, but seriously, how many District Judges have been removed in Kansas from the Bench? One, and it was so long ago Kansas records can't even remember what he was removed for. Now if a Judge does make a bad decision as clearly stated in the cases above, should he/she be able to correct that decision, or are they to high and mighty to correct their injustice after they have had some time to reflect? Some would say that's what the court of appeals are for, but why, come on, why does it have to even go to something like that?

        Common sense says if you rape a little girl or beat the hell out of your wife you shall get punished for that in a severe matter. However, the law states otherwise, and the list of outrage goes on.

        More Here

        legal briefs here: KS Appellate -- KS Supreme Court Briefs

        Monday, January 17, 2011

        I have a dream too --- That mothers and children can be free from Torture

        A special note from Claudine Dombrowski American Mothers Political Party Australian Mothers Political Party

        “I have a dream as well--- That mothers and children can be free from Torture -- that No More women and children are killed--That intimate violence be treated as it is, homeland terrorism -- “

        “That the federally funded genocide called Fatherhood Initiatives -- be ended, and mothers, the natural guardian, be allowed to raise her own children.”

        “I love you my daughter Rikki Dombrowski one of many forced to live in a cage, in silence, in pain without her mother-- without freedom, without voice. Run like the wind Baby---Fly High, Fly Free.”

        That the four horsemen begin a reign of “Justice”—on the corrupt human/child traffickers in Topeka, 3rd Judicial District, Shawnee County, Kansas Courts, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes GAL, ABUSER HAL RICHARDSON, Donald Hoffman, Jason P. Hoffman, David C. Rodeheffer, Safe Visit, Odyssey, Kira Haney, Rene Netherton.

        www.AngelFury.org   | www.KS-FCRC.com | www.KansansForJudicialAccountability.com | www.AmericanMothersPoliticalParty.org

        “He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
        Martin Luther King, Jr.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZLvSnr6s50


        The Manhattan Free Press On Line

        By this time records show Hal Richardson had abused Claudine and he had Domestic ... of physical and verbal abuse she had suffered from Mr. Richardson." Hal ...
        www.kansas.net/~freepress/7-12-01-8.html

        http://www.scribd.com/AnotherAnonymom

        clip_image001

        4 Documents

        Court GOSSIP File

        ·· Documents:4

        1. 2004 June 4th Court Service Officer Report (again all info from DAD dads friends and dads word- poor

        2. 2006 March Hoffmans 'Friend' Submits Report for dad and girlfriend (never meeting mom)

        3. 2004 March 31 Loyd Swartz to Judge Emails

        4. 2004 May14 Letter to From Girl Scouts on 'Request' by Dad.

        See all 4 documents

        Edit

        clip_image002

        10 Documents

        Legal Email

        · Documents:10

        1. 2006 Aug Letter to Judge Johnson

        2. 2006 email legal mhp court ag email

        3. Hearing Finally Set0 From the Sept 27th, 2006 30 Days Couirt Order

        4. Mary Bickford School Sec. Attachments to Letter Request Hearing Dec 2004

        5. my reps dorthy and sandy

        See all 10 documents

        Edit

        clip_image003

        2 Documents

        CINC to keep child from Abuser

        · Documents:2

        1. 1999 march 23rd CINC (details child sexual, abuse and neglect) pediatrician medical records indicat

        2. 5-21-1999 CINC Barton County to Keep Minor Child Safe From Abusive Father Dom Brow Ski

        See all 2 documents

        Edit

        clip_image004

        13 Documents

        Safe Visit-- Odyssey SUPERVISED VISITATION Reports, memos et el

        http://www.projectappleseed.org/safevisit.html Children's Rights Council Supervised Network aka Fathers Rights Initatives

        · Documents:13

        1. 9-9-2001 Leonard Robinson Atty Letter to Dom Brow Ski and the DA en Re RAPE

        2. 2005 March 1 Safe Visit

        3. 2005 March 1 Safe Visit1

        4. 2005 August 22 - Judge Wilson Report Safe Visit

        5. safevisitrequestjune7,200 5

        See all 13 documents

        Edit

        clip_image005

        29 Documents

        Letters to Judges CSO, CMs, GAL's

        · Documents:29

        1. 1999 Judges Minutes

        2. 1999 Letter From King to Hoffman

        3. 2006 Aug Letter to Judge Johnson

        4. 9-9-2001 Leonard Robinson Atty Letter to Dom Brow Ski and the DA en Re RAPE

        5. Dec 6, 2004 Plea for Hearing

        See all 29 documents

        Edit

        clip_image006

        5 Documents

        Media

        · Documents:5

        1. 2009 april -6th shawnee county courts mom guilty contempt and further ordered to remove public recor

        2. Somewhere Over the Rainbow, Where's a Pair of Ruby Slippers when you need them

        3. showdown in shawnee count1

        4. 12-4-1997 KC Star Tony Rizzo-KS Justice Commission -Dombrowski

        5. Fall 2001 KS Now -Custody Case From Hell- Claudine Dom Brow Ski

        See all 5 documents

        clip_image007

        3 Documents

        Correspondence, AG, Reps, Congress, Federal

        1. Jackie Williams Email 2oo7

        2. 1995-Feb 21 D.A. Affidavit for Domestic Violence (Conviction) Case No. 94-CR-836 Hal Richardson- Do

        3. 1-20-1998 KS AG Letters and Appointment to Comittee-Claudine Dom Brow Ski

        See all 3 documents

        Edit

        clip_image008

        18 Documents

        ORDERS

        · Documents:18

        1. 1999 dad order to pay cs-- but never did

        2. 1999 Order Child Support-Richardson

        3. 2000 Aug 28 Motion For New Trial Denied --R.King

        4. 2000 Dec 29 EXPARTE' Order Suspend Parenting Time with Mom

        5. 2000 July 31-- Custody Switch-Judge Richard Anderson Gives FULL custody to CRIMINAL HAL RICHARDSON

        See all 18 documents

        Edit

        clip_image009

        25 Documents

        CSO, Court Memos Emails, letters not on the court record

        · Documents:25

        1. 1999 Judges Minutes

        2. 1999 Letter From King to Hoffman

        3. Dec 6, 2004 Plea for Hearing

        4. 7-24-2001 Judge 8-30-2001 CM- Memos

        5. 2001 Sept. 5 Judge Marla Luckert to Judge Anderson--'Interception of Emails to Judge From Website

        See all 25 documents

        Edit

        clip_image010

        38 Documents

        Motions

        · Documents:38

        1. 1999 CS Worksheet

        2. 1999 May Motion - Hoffman Files Advance Hearingto Case Manager

        3. 1999 Motion by Richardson for Change of Custody From Mom Dombrowski

        4. 1999 October 05 Objection Case Manager R. King

        5. 2000 April 17--- Motion to Change Custody to Richardson from Dombrowski (mom)

        See all 38 documents

        Edit

        clip_image011

        9 Documents

        District Attorney Affidavits- Correspondebce

        · Documents:9

        1. 1990 sarp records 3 1990_1

        2. 9-9-2001 Leonard Robinson Atty Letter to Dom Brow Ski and the DA en Re RAPE

        3. 9-9-2001 Leonard Robinson Atty Letter to Dom Brow Ski and the DA en Re RAPE

        4. 1995 DV 95CR836 Mary Kelly PSI Not Good Candiate for Probation_1

        5. 1995 DV 95CR836 Mary Kelly PSI Not Good Candiate for Probation_2

        See all 9 documents

        Edit

        clip_image012

        5 Documents

        Criminal Record HAL RICHARDSON

        · Documents:5

        1. 1990 sarp records 3 1990_1

        2. 9-9-2001 Leonard Robinson Atty Letter to Dom Brow Ski and the DA en Re RAPE

        3. 1995 DV 95CR836 Mary Kelly PSI Not Good Candiate for Probation_1

        4. 1995 DV 95CR836 Mary Kelly PSI Not Good Candiate for Probation_2

        5. 95cr 00836 dv against dombrowski conviction

        See all 5 documents

        Edit

        clip_image013

        2 Documents

        Battered Womens Task Force Records

        · Documents:2

        1. 1997 Closed Camera Inspection of 30 Day Drug Alchohol Hal Richardson Aug_1

        2. 1995 - 1996 Battered Womens Task Force-Records of Claudine Dombrowski case no

        See all 2 documents

        Edit

        clip_image014

        4 Documents

        Medical Records of Abuse

        · Documents:4

        1. 9-9-2001 Leonard Robinson Atty Letter to Dom Brow Ski and the DA en Re RAPE

        2. Rape 2001 Medical Records_1

        3. 1996 Dr. Joel Nance Psych Eval. Judicial Notice Taken by Courts Claudine Dom Brow Ski

        4. 1994-1996 Medical records of Abuse claudine dombrowski

        See all 4 documents

        Edit

        clip_image015

        12 Documents

        KS Appellate -- KS Supreme Court Briefs

        · Documents:12

        1. 2000 Aug 7 Court of Appeals Response to 1999 Appellate Brief

        2. 2000 Aug 8 Appealls Affirms

        3. 11-8-1999 supreme court of kansas, appellant petition for review (rebecca king)

        4. 12-14-1999 kansas court of appeals brief of appellant dombrowski case 96d217 apeals judge buchele, j

        5. 11-20-1997 kansas supreme court petition for review dombrowski v richardson case 96d217

        See all 12 documents

        Edit

        clip_image016

        34 Documents

        Psych Reports, Guardian ad Litem, Custody Eval, Co-parenting therapy et el

        · Documents:34

        1. 2007 Oct_1

        2. 2003 Sept CM Order Frm Bruns to Llyod Swartz

        3. 1997 closed camera inspection of 30 day drug alchohol hal richardson aug_1

        4. 1997 Closed Camera Inspection of 30 Day Drug Alchohol Hal Richardson Aug_1

        5. 2007 Oct.7 Disiplinary Complaint GAL -M_1

        See all 34 documents

        Edit

        clip_image017

        13 Documents

        Transcripts

        · Documents:13

        1. 2007 April 4 Hearing Transcript Richardson Dombrowski

        2. 2008 Nov 4- Transcript Hearing Judge Debenham- Denting Child to Attend Granny's Funeral

        3. transcriptofproceedings12 -16-08

        4. 2008 Dec. 16- Transcript of Hearing 'Parenting Time' Judge Debenam- Dom Brow Ski -Denied--Again

        5. 6-8-2000 transcript as an order by judge richard anderson

        See all 13 documents

        Tuesday, November 30, 2010

        Faces of the Family Court Crisis from James Hall Photography

        Faces of the Family Court Crisis from James Hall Photography on Vimeo.

        A project for Center for Judicial Excellence (centerforjudicialexcellence.org).
        Video and photography by James Hall (88zero.com).
        Original score by Matteo Favero (figuramusicstudio.com/​)
        To learn more go to: centerforjudicialexcellence.org/​PhotoExhibit.htm

        “DANGEROUS” CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI ATTENDS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RALLY: DOES SHE FACE JUDICIAL RETALIATION AGAIN?

        “DANGEROUS” CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI ATTENDS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RALLY: DOES SHE FACE JUDICIAL RETALIATION AGAIN?

        FILED IN: CHILD CUSTODY BATTLE, CHILD CUSTODY FOR SALE, CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI,CORRUPT JUDGES, CORRUPT LAWYERS, CORRUPT BASTARDS, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DON HOFFMAN,FACEBOOK, FATHERS RIGHTS, HAL RICHARDSON, HUMAN RIGHTS, JASON P. HOFFMAN, JILL DYKES, JUDGE DAVID DEBENHAM, JUDGES WHO BREAK THE LAW, JUDICIAL IMMUNITY, KANSAS, RIKKI DOMBROWSKI, CHILD CUSTODY FOR ABUSERS, JUDICIAL RETALIATION

        If anyone should face jail time it is snorting Topeka lawyer Jason P. Hoffman for aiding and abetting a convicted abuser Hal Richardson and for lying in court (yeah, I’m not forgetting he claimed Claudine was me….Hoffman LIED willingly after I provided information in this blog identifying me as being in the court room with her in January).

        This past Tuesday, three days before this rally shown above, Claudine was found to be “dangerous” in Shawnee County’s Kangaroo Court with Judge David Debenham.  Judge Debenham also should be facing jail time for illegally taking this case from another judge. Here are pictures of “dangerous” Claudine:

        Claudine after giving birth to Rikki in 1994 (see her black eyes!)

        A very "dangerous Claudine" after ex-husband Hal Richardson beat her with a crowbar in 1996.

        "Dangerous Claudine" after ex-husband Hal Richardson raped and beat her in 2000.

        Claudine became so "dangerous" ex-husband Hal Richardson had to hire someone to assault her in 2003.

        Claudine is prohibited from talking about her own case.  She is ordered to shut up, so that the corruption stays hidden.  The rest of us will not shut up though…Claudine does not have to talk about her case.  We will make sure the rest of the world knows about it.  The Executive Office of the President of the United States has returned several times, as has the U.S. Department of Justice.  One of our partners in fighting corrupt bastards like this just let us know Obama and Biden invited her in to talk, we are keeping our fingers crossed on this.

        Read about Claudine’s case here at Stop Family Violence.

        Lastly, corrupt Guardian ad Litem Jill Dykes, who fought to have Claudine punished for having an image of her own daughter Rikki on the internet, has posted her own pictures of Rikki on her Facebook page (we have the screen shots).  And had her husband call Claudine and threaten her (probably because she is so dangerous).  Ooooooooh.  I see jail in her future.  If not, you can bet she and her corrupt buddies probably bought her way out of it.  Jill Dykes actually lunged and screamed at Claudine at the court house last week when she saw she had the pictures.  What an incredibly poor excuse for a human being this Jill Dykes is!  I think this time they all went too far and will be paying the price for it.

        The biggest victim of all is Rikki Dombrowski, who was crying to Claudine this past spring on the phone that she was not being allowed by daddy Hal Richardson to see her mom on a two hour visitation.  This was the last time any excuse was given…they just failed to show up for the court-ordered visitation thereafter.  How heartbreaking…Rikki was ripped apart because she couldn’t see her mother.  Now she is bullied to say what daddy wants.

          She knows what daddy is capable of.  Just look at the pictures above.

        American Mothers Political Party Upcoming Show: 12/2/2010 5:00 PM SUSAN MURPHY-MILANO SPECIAL GUEST

         

        A special call out will go to Rene M Netherton, M. Jill Dykes, Don Hoffman, Jason P Hoffman, Judge David Debenham and all those who conspired to take Rikki Dombrowski from her mother Claudine Dombrowski and Give to a Convicted Abuser Hal Richardson. Topeka, Kansas Case No. 96D217.

        To this day have continued to deny justice to yet another of many Mothers and their children involved in Intimate Violence and family Violence and maintain coercive control over their victims.

        Call-in Number: (347) 205-9977

         www.AmericanMothersPoliticalParty.org

        Presents:

         American Mothers Political Party BTR—LIVE Radio


        SPECIAL GUEST! Susan Murphy-Milano is a non-fiction author and violence expert—a defender of victims' rights. A radio show host, Susan has appeared on Oprah, 20/20, American Justice, and CNN.

        As a nationally recognized women's advocate, she was instrumental in the passage of the Illinois Stalking Law and the Lautenberg Act.

        Susan's 4th book, "Time's Up” How to Escape Abusive and Stalking Relationships Guide , A Survival Manual for those in abuse, stalking and Violent Relationships.

        Creator and Co-host of the hottest shows on Blog Talk radio: "Intimate Partner Homicide Investigation" with co-host Sheryl McCollum Director of the Cold Case Institute and sponsored by www.websleuths.com and Crime Wire www.blogtalkradio.com/crimewire for families seeking answers in suspicious and unsolved crimes with co-hosts veteran law enforcement and authors Vito Colucci, Jr., and Dennis N. Griffith.

        We will be discussing the latest case of a suicidal fathers rampage, John Skelton, who on Thanksgiving day gave his children to a woman so that he could commit suicide.

        He survived but the children and the mystery woman are still missing. We will be asking Susan questions on how this case relates to the countless she has experienced and taking your thoughts and questions.

        This is the show you don't want to MISS!

         

        Tuesday, November 23, 2010

        The Guardian Ad Litem Scandals- Over 58,000 Children are Court Ordered to live with Abusers and Pedophiles

        The Guardian Ad Litem Scandals- Over 58,000 Children are Court Ordered to live with Abusers and Pedophiles

        In Kansas, GAL’s that do this are M. Jill Dykes, Rene M. Netherton, Scott McKenzie

        of Course the JUDGE is the ultimate—betrayer—he chooses to allow this to happen  when he could be a just Judge—a human Judge---

        JUDGE DAVID DEBENHAM Topeka, KS.

        posted by AMPP

        How Many Children Are Court -Ordered Into Unsupervised Contact With an Abusive Parent After Divorce?

        In a Conservative Estimate — OVER 58,000 children are Court Ordered every year to live with the Abuser. This is more than twice the amount of childhood cancer. That’s over 1,000 children each and every week!

        Listen Now:  The Guardian Ad Litem Scandals – Legislative Reforms Needed

        clip_image001Posted with permissions from: Montana Public Radio, KUFM, which ran on their news broadcast 10-5-2010.

        Interview with Assistant News Director Edward O’Brien and Kathleen Russell of the www.CenterForJudicialExcellence.org about the cottage industry of Guardian Ad Litems aka GAL’s and the much needed State to State Reforms to pull their Immunity from accountability and prosecution for sending children to live with abusers in Disputed Child Custody Cases.

        Remember that therapeutic jurisprudence COSTS money, and prolongs litigation. It costs nothing to abrogate their immunity and/or to get rid of them. See,http://www.thelizlibrary.org/therapeutic-jurisprudence/TheDetectives.html

        Listen Now:  The Guardian Ad Litem Scandals – Legislative Reforms Needed

        Powered by Podbean.com

        OVER 58,000 children are Court Ordered every year to live with the Abuser.

        Contact: Joyanna Silberg, PhD, Executive Vice President

        tel: (410) 938-4974 or email Joyanna Silberg

        According to a conservative estimate by experts at the Leadership Council on Child Abuseand Interpersonal Violence (LC), more than 58,000 children a year are ordered into unsupervised contact with physically or sexually abusive parents following divorce in the United States. This is over twice the yearly rate of new cases of childhood cancer.

        Experts at the LC consider the crisis in our family courts to constitute a public health crisis. Once placed with an abusive parent or forced to visit, children will continue to be exposed to parental violence and abuse until they reach 18. Thus, we estimate that half a million children will be affected in the US at any point of time. Many of these children will suffer physical and psychological damage which may take a lifetime to heal. The Leadership Council urges citizens to work with legislators and agencies in their communities to examine this problem, review state agency policies and procedures, and develop legislative and policy solutions that help ensure safety from violence for children following divorce.

        How We Obtained This Estimate:

        No one knows the exact number of children who are left in the unprotected care of an abusive parent following their parents’ divorce. The Leadership Council has studied the problem and using the best available research has attempted to come up with a conservative estimate of the problem. We estimate that each year, 58,500 minor children are placed at risk for injury because the courts ordered them into the unsupervised care of a violent parent.

        The estimate is meant to be conservative and was obtained using the figures in the following table. The research that we used to obtain these figures is explained in more depth in the following section.

        Number of children affected by divorce each year

        1,000,000

        Number of families with allegations of child abuse and/or severe domestic violence (13%)

        x.13

         

        =130,000 cases

        When investigated, percentage of cases found to be valid or suspected to be valid. (Research suggests that the number is between 43 and 73%, with most data showing the rate is closer to 70%. To be conservative we will use 60%)

        X .60

         

        =78,000

        Percentage of children left unprotected. (Research suggests that the number is between 56-90%, with most data showing the rate is closer to 90%. A conservative estimate is 75%)

        X .75

        Estimate of children in the U.S. who are left in the unprotected care of an abuser after their parents’ divorce

        =58,500

        The research:

        Estimates suggest that between 1 and 1.5 million children experience the divorce of their parents each year — ultimately 40% of all children are affected by divorce.1,2,3

        It is difficult to determine the number of divorcing families affected by violence. The Women’s Law Center of Maryland analyzed an extensive dataset, which consists of a random sampling of all divorce and custody cases filed in Maryland during fiscal year 1999. Domestic violence (including child abuse) was alleged by at least one party in 240 cases out of 1,847 (13.0%).4

        This is likely an underestimate as court records often fail to note domestic violence5 and other studies have shown higher rates. For example, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), looking solely at court records, found documentedevidence of domestic violence in 24%-55% of custody court records depending on the state.6

        In addition, studies suggest that in divorces marked by ongoing disputes over the custody and care of children, there is often a history of violence in the family and a likelihood that the violence will continue after the separation. In many cases, the violence involves severe battering and/or the use of weapons.7

        To be conservative we will go with 13%. So how many of these allegations are likely to be valid. Research suggests when allegations of child abuse are investigated, approximately 50-73% are found to be valid.8

        However, when courts get involved in determining custody, children are rarely protected from the violent parent. In at least 75% of cases the child is ordered into unsupervised contact with the alleged abuser. (Research has found results ranging from 56-90%; a conservative estimate is 75%).9

        So how many children whose parents divorce are left in the unprotected care of an abuser each year in the United States ? Thus a conservative estimate based on available research is that approximately 58,500 are left at risk of physical and psychological injury after being ordered into the unsupervised care of an abuser after their parents divorce. This number includes both those who are left in the sole care of an abuser and those who are required to have unsupervised visits.

        Compare this to the number of cases of childhood cancer per year. In 2004 the incidence rate of newly diagnosed childhood cancers in the U.S. was 22,586.10

        Most people who divorce do so early in their marriage,.3 and children who are court-ordered into the custody of, or unsupervised visitation with, an abuser will be at risk of abuse until they reach adulthood. Consequently, at any point in time it is likely that a half a million children are left unprotected from a violent parent after their parents’ divorce.

        References

        1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2000). Divorce – Helping Children Adjust.http://www.medem.com/medlb/article_detaillb.cfm?article_ID=ZZZ4KZADH4C⊂_cat=0
        (“Every year, more than one million children in the United States experience the divorce of their parents.”)

        2. National Institutes of Mental Health. (2002, October 15). Preventive Sessions After Divorce Protect Children into Teens.
        http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2002/preventive-sessions-after-divorce-protect-children-into-teens.shtml
        (“About 1.5 million children experience the divorce of their parents each year—ultimately 40 percent of all children.”)

        3. Shiono, P. H., & Quinn, L. S. (1994, Spring). Epidemiology of Divorce.Future of Children, 4 (1). Available athttp://www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/vol4no1ART2.pdf
        (Each year since the mid-1970s, more than 1 million children have experienced a family divorce.”)

        4. The Women’s Law Center of Maryland. (2004). Custody and financial distribution in Maryland: An empirical study of custody and divorce cases filed in Maryland during fiscal year 1999. Towson, MD.
        http://www.wlcmd.org/pdf/CustodyFinancialDistributionInMD.pdf
        (“Domestic violence (including child abuse) was alleged by at least one party in 240 cases out of 1,847 (13.0 percent). Of these, 169 allegations were made by women and 36 by men.”)

        5. Kernic, M.A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D. J., Koepsell, J. K., & Holt, V. L. (2005). Children in the crossfire: Child custody determinations among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women,11 (8), 991-1021.
        (Researchers at the Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center in Seattle , studied divorce cases and found that in 47.6% of cases with a documented, substantiated history of domestic violence, no mention of the abuse was found in the divorce case files. Similarly the National Center for State Courts that a screening process [utilized by the mediation program] revealed a much higher incidence of domestic violence than a review of court records alone would have indicated [see ref 6 below]).

        6. Susan Keilitz et al, Domestic Violence and Child Custody Disputes: A Resource Handbook for Judges and Court Managers , prepared for the National Center for State Courts; State Justice Institute," NCSC Publication Number R- 202, p. 5.

        7. Johnston, J. R. (1994). High-Conflict Divorce. The Future of Children, 4(1), 165-182, p. 167.

        8. Research used in substantiation estimate:

        Brown, T., Frederico, M., Hewitt, L., & Sheehan, R. (1997). Problems and solutions in the management of child abuse allegations in custody and access disputes in the family court. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36(4), 431-443.
        (Researchers reviewed court records of some 200 families where child abuse allegations had been made in custody and access disputes in jurisdictions in two states, observed court proceedings and interviewed court and related services’ staff.The allegations of abuse were usually valid. 70% were determined to involve severe physical and/or sexual abuse.The overall rate of false allegations during divorce to be about 9%, similar to the rate of false allegations in noncustody related investigations.)

        Faller, K. C., & DeVoe, E. (1995). Allegations of sexual abuse in divorce. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 4 (4), 1-25.
        (Researchers examined 214 allegations of sexual abuse in divorce cases that were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team at a university-based clinic. 72.6% were determined likely; 20% unlikely; and 7.4% uncertain. Of the 20% of cases that were judged to be false or possibly false cases, only approximately a quarter (n = 10) were determined to have been consciously made. The remainder were classified as misinterpretations.)

        Thoennes, N., & Tjaden, P. G. (1990). The extent, nature, and validity of sexual abuse allegations in custody and visitation disputes. Child Sexual Abuse & Neglect, 14(2), 151-63.
        (Researchers examined court records in 9,000 families in custody/visitation disputes. In the 129 cases for which a determination of the validity of the allegation was available, 50% were found to involve abuse , 33% were found to involve no abuse, and 17% resulted in an indeterminate ruling. [*note: Court records provide less reliable than evaluations by multidisciplinary teams trained in recognizing child abuse].)

        Jones, D.P.H., & Seig, A. (1988). Child sexual abuse allegations in custody or visitation disputes: A report of 20 cases. In E.B. Nicholson & J. Bulkley (Eds.), Sexual Abuse Allegations in Custody and Visitation Cases: A Resource Book for Judges and Court Personnel. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, pp. 22-36.
        (This article reports on 20 cases evaluated by the C. Henry Kempe Centre which involved both sexual abuse allegations and a parental custody dispute. 70% of cases were found to be reliable and 20% of the cases appeared fictitious.)

        McGraw, J.M., & Smith, H.A. (1992). Child sexual abuse allegations amidst divorce and custody proceedings: Refining the validation process. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(1), 49-61.
        (This study describes 18 cases of child sexual abuse allegations made during divorce and custody disputes. The cases were reviewed using the clinical process of validation used at the Kempe Center in Denver, Colorado. The number of cases categorized as founded was eight [44.4%].  In two cases [ 11%]) there was insufficient information to make a determination, and five were judged to be based on an unsubstantiated suspicion. Three cases were judged to be fictitious [16.5%], only one of which came from a child.)

        Paradise, J. E., Rostain, A. L., & Nathanson, M. (1988). Substantiation of sexual abuse charges when parents dispute custody or visitation. Pediatrics, 81(6), 835-9.
        (Researchers systematically evaluated child sexual abuse cases in a hospital-based consecutive series and one author’s practice were systematically reviewed. Abuse allegations made within the context custody or visitation dispute [39% of the sample] were compared with cases in which custody or visitation was not an issue. Cases involving custody problems were found to involve younger children [5.4 vs 7.8 years]. Sexual abuse allegations were substantiated less frequently when there was concomitant parental conflict [nonsignificant] but were nevertheless substantiated more than half of the time.)

        Trocme, N., & Bala, N. (2005). False allegations of abuse and neglect when parents separate. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(12), 1333. (PDF)
        Using data from the 1998 Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS-98), this paper provides a detailed summary of the characteristics associated with intentionally false reports of child abuse and neglect within the context of parental separation. The national study examined abuse and neglect investigated by child welfare services in Canada.
        When there was an on-going custody dispute the substantiation rate by CPS was 40% and an addition 14% were suspected but there wasn’t enough evidence to make a final determination. 12% were believed to be intentionally false. Allegations of neglect was the most common form of intentionally fabricated maltreatment. Substantiation rates varied significantly by source of report, with reports from the police (60%), custodial parents (47%), and children (54%) being generally most likely to be substantiated, while noncustodial parents (usually fathers) have a lower substantiation rate (33%), and anonymous reports being least likely to be substantiated (16%). Of the intentionally false allegations of maltreatment tracked by the study, custodial parents (usually mothers) and children were least likely to fabricate reports of abuse or neglect.

        Hlady, L.J., & Gunter, E.J. (1990). Alleged child abuse in custody access disputes.Child Abuse & Neglect, 14(4), 591-3.
        (Researchers reviewed the charts of all children involved in custody access disputes seen by Child Protective Services (CPS) at British Columbia’s Children’s Hospital in 1988. Of the 370 such children evaluated by CPS, 34 involved allegations of child sexual abuse (CSA) that arose during custody/access disputes. These children’s physical examinations were then compared with the 219 children seen during the same one-year period for alleged CSA not involving custody/access disputes. A similar percentage of positive physical findings were found in both groups. It is concluded that the concern that allegations of CSA that arise during custody/access disputes are likely to be false is not borne out by these findings.)

        9. Research used in this estimate:

        Neustein, A., & Goetting, A. (1999). Judicial Responses to Protective Parents, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 4, 103-122.
        http://www.haworthpressinc.com/store/SampleText/J070.pdf (go to page 109 of pdf)
        (Examined judicial responses to protective parents’ complaints of child sexual abuse in 300 custody cases with extensive family court records. The investigators found that only in 10% of cases was primary custody was given to the protective parent and supervised contact with alleged abuser.Conversely, 20% of the cases resulted in a predominantly negative outcome where the child was placed in the primary legal and physical custody of the allegedly sexually abusive parent (see p. 108). In the rest of the cases, the judges awarded joint custody with no provisions for supervised visitation with the alleged abuser.)

        Lowenstein, S. R. (1991). Child sexual abuse in custody and visitation litigation: Representation for the benefit of victims. UMKC Law Review, 60, 227-82.
        (This study examined 96 custody and visitation disputes involving allegations of child sexual abuse from 33 states. Visitation was the principal issues in 36 cases. The father was alleged to have sexually molested their child in each of these 36 cases. Yet in two-thirds (24) of these cases the alleged perpetrator was granted unsupervised visitation.
        Custody was the principle issue in 56 cases. In 27 of the 56 cases (48%) mothers lost custody.In 17 of these cases (63%) the mother lost custody to a father alleged to be a perpetrator. In two cases (3.6%) fathers lost custody. No father lost custody to a mother whose household included an alleged perpetrator (either the mother, a stepfather, the mother’s boyfriend, or one of mother’s relatives).

        Kernic, M.A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D. J., Koepsell, J. K., & Holt, V. L. (2005). Children in the crossfire: Child custody determinations among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women,11(8), 991-1021.
        (Examined the effects of a history of interpersonal violence on child custody and visitation outcomes. Mothers in cases with a violent partner were no more likely to obtain custody than mothers in non-abuse cases. Fathers with a history of committing abuse were denied child visitation in only 17% of cases.)

        Saccuzzo, D. P., & Johnson, N. E. (2004). Child custody mediation’s failure to protect: Why should the criminal justice system care? National Institute of Justice Journal, 251, 21-23. Available at http://ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/jr000251.pdf
        (Researchers compared 200 child custody mediations involving charges of domestic violence with 200 mediations that did not.Joint legal custody was awarded about 90% of the time, even when domestic violence was an issue.)

        See also:
        Johnson, N. E., Saccuzzo, D. P., & Koen, W. J. (2005). Child custody mediation in cases of domestic violence: Empirical evidence of a failure to protect. Violence Against Women, 11(8), 1022-1053.

        10. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. (2007). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2004 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute.Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs .

        For more information see:

        Dallam. S. J., & Silberg, J. L. (Jan/Feb 2006). Myths that place children at risk during custody disputes. Sexual Assault Report, 9 (3), 33-47. (PDF)

        American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. (2006). 10 Myths About Custody and Domestic Violence and How to Counter Them. Washington, DC: Author.http://leadershipcouncil.org/docs/ABA_custody_myths.pdf

        More research is available from the Leadership Council web site
        www.leadershipcouncil.org

        The Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence is composed of national leaders in psychology, psychiatry, medicine, law, and public policy who are committed to the ethical application of psychological science and countering its misuse by special interest groups. Members of the Council are dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of children and other vulnerable populations. More information can be found at:www.leadershipcouncil.org